See revenue by source
Compare channels, campaigns, pages, referrers, and sessions by the money they create, not just by traffic volume.
Umami alternative
Umami is a good option when you want simple web analytics. Talivia takes the same lightweight instinct and points it at revenue: source, session, payment, and diagnostics.
Screenshot coming soon: source, entry page, activity, and payment in one place.
Why teams compare them
If you are comparing Umami alternatives, you probably care about simplicity and ownership. Talivia adds a founder-focused revenue workflow on top of that idea.
Compare channels, campaigns, pages, referrers, and sessions by the money they create, not just by traffic volume.
Keep pricing predictable while your traffic grows instead of worrying about every pageview or custom event.
Go from a chart to the exact paid session, then inspect the activity and payment context behind the conversion.
Try the simpler route
Start with one website and one payment connection, then decide if Talivia gives you the source-to-payment clarity you need.
Umami vs Talivia
Umami is a clean analytics path when you want web metrics. Talivia is the sharper fit when the daily question is which session and source created a customer.
| Area | Umami | Talivia |
|---|---|---|
| Product philosophy | A simple analytics product for teams that want clean website metrics without a heavy dashboard. | A revenue attribution product for founders who want website analytics tied directly to payments. |
| Open source | A strong fit when open-source web analytics itself is the main requirement. | Open-source direction with a product surface centered on payment attribution and diagnostics. |
| Revenue workflow | Good when pageviews, events, referrers, and sessions are enough. | Built to connect referrer, campaign, landing page, visitor activity, and payment amount. |
| Payment diagnostics | Best when payment matching is handled somewhere else. | Highlights payments that were not attributed, so attribution gaps become visible. |
| Pricing | Best when its hosting and operations model matches your team. | $10/month after trial. No event-count pricing in the launch offer. |
| Best fit | Teams that need simple open-source website analytics. | Founders who need simple analytics and want revenue to be the first-class metric. |
Which should you choose?
Migration path
You do not have to rip anything out. Install Talivia on the same funnel, connect payment data, and compare how quickly you can answer source-to-payment questions.
Keep Umami in place while you add Talivia to one website and the pages that drive signups or checkout traffic.
Start with Stripe or the manual payment API so revenue can be matched to visitor and session context.
Review recent payments, check whether source and entry page are attached, and inspect activity around each purchase.
Use revenue by source, campaign, page, and session to decide which channels deserve more work.
FAQ
Talivia is a good Umami alternative when you want simple analytics with payment attribution, paid-session inspection, and source-level revenue reporting.
Choose Talivia when you need analytics to answer which source, page, and session generated a payment.
Yes. You can keep Umami for existing web analytics and add Talivia to inspect paid-session attribution.
Talivia is moving with an open-source codebase. The public repository link is not wired into this page yet.
Yes. Talivia supports Stripe payment tracking and a manual payment import path.
Talivia is positioned around a simple $10/month launch plan after the trial.
Talivia gives founders simple analytics, paid-session inspection, and payment diagnostics for one predictable monthly price.
Try Talivia free